Britain appears to be trapped in a vicious cycle of poverty.I’ve got a plan to raise billions to solve this problem | Gordon Brown

An election year is a time to confront the paralyzing melancholy and declinist thinking that plagues our country and usher in a new era of hope by rediscovering our moral compass.

The British people long to feel part of a national effort.But instead, near-zero growth is spawning zero sum mentality, a belief that you can do better only at the expense of others.Young people—the most optimistic about the future in history—have a desire to believe in something greater than themselves, but this generation lose confidence quickly inside Very progressive idea.but The most damaging twists in this doomed cycle are caused by rising poverty, the despair and division it creates, and growing public concern about its impact on social cohesion. To escape this vicious cycle, the UK needs a reason for optimism – and a good place to start is with a new partnership to end poverty, by bringing charities, companies, communities and government together on a common national plan , showing that Britain’s unity is not just in name only.

For today’s poor children, these are desperate times. 4.3 million children – a number equivalent to four cities the size of Birmingham – was announced last week. below official poverty line Enough is enough, but we are now witnessing on the ground the shame and poverty we once thought were history. The number of children now reaches 1.5 million of Six million people suffer “extreme” povertylife is not only below the standard relief line (i.e. 60% of typical income), but also below 40%. 1 million children People believe they have recently experienced “poverty,” defined as a lack of the absolute basics of life: warmth, dryness, cleanliness, shelter, and food.

last night, 140,000 children are homelessand 1.1 million teenagers Trying to sleep without your own bed; estimate 2.6 million children lack meals. No society can and should feel at ease when children grow up in houses without heating, kitchens without cooking utensils, bedrooms without beds, floors without floors, toilets without toilet paper or soap. All the evidence shows that unless we act, things will get worse.

But how to solve this problem? Three huge shifts have occurred over the past decade. First, the welfare safety net has been systematically shredded and the government has abdicated the responsibilities it had taken for granted since 1945. Secondly, charities and food banks replaced universal assistance. They are exhausted by credit as a last line of defence, angry at having to pick up the slack due to a lack of resources, and even worried that their desperate rescue efforts might provide cover for the government to go further. Third, they feel deeply uncertain about their suitability for poverty. To achieve a pollution-free, pollution-free future, the corporate sector has given less, not more, over the past decade. Yet many business leaders now advocating for greater environmental and social responsibility know they can and should play a greater role.

“The goal is not to rely on food banks forever as a substitute for necessary long-term solutions, but to create immediate breathing space out of mass poverty.” Photo: Jon Santa Cruz/REX/Shutterstock

Now with Jeremy Hunt Cue a fall mini budgetThis government has one last chance to break with the past decade and give hope to millions of people by setting a firm timetable to eradicate poverty and eradicate extreme poverty.

We cannot escape the changing nature of poverty that we are addressing. A generation ago, unemployment was the overwhelming cause. Today, with nearly three-quarters of poor children living in working families, no government can continue to perpetuate the myth of the majority. Our poor are either able to work or belong to a dependent culture.As well as a thorough review of Universal Credit to reflect this, we should also raise the pay floor and create new opportunities to climb the career ladder, including through better skills ( today Only one in six low-wage earners can escape low pay), and realign a variety of markets that currently disadvantage poorer households—utilities, travel, rental housing, and child care. We should be giving those who are sick and financially inactive NHS help to restore their health before giving lectures about laziness.

But action cannot wait for reviews and phased reforms, however necessary. There would be a way out of the current emergency if the government declared poverty eradication a national goal and set clear deadlines. It could then credibly invite charities, businesses and community and civil society groups to immediately join time-bound partnerships to alleviate poverty. Only then will it become clear that the common goal is not to rely on food banks forever to replace necessary long-term solutions, but to create immediate breathing space as governments help us escape mass poverty.

Within the fiscal context, the Government can build on the £1 billion per year allocated to the Family Support Fund so far. This could be achieved by imposing similar reserve requirements, starting from between £1.3 billion and £3.3 billion.Banks currently do what the ECB, SNB and others currently do (and we once did), so assuming poverty eradication is only a fraction of what the banks currently receive interest payment their balances with the Bank of England.

go through Simplify gift aid system£700m of ancillary relief is currently refundable to high-income donors and can be directed towards good causes. The Chancellor’s Autumn Statement may also provide additional time-limited tax incentives to encourage greater donations. The top 1% donated only 0.2% in total Their income – it’s just Average income £271,000, £538 per yearBut if these 1% were inspired to donate 1%, 1.4 billion pounds could be raised for charity every year.

Some companies take corporate philanthropy seriously, but overall, their donations only represent 0.8% of pre-tax profits for FTSE 100 companiesBut even if the real value of their donations remained at the level of a decade ago, charity income would now be at least £5 billion higher.

During the current emergency, businesses should consider donating more of their surplus products, thereby reducing pollution and poverty. But if they can’t donate for free, they should sell essential items — toothpaste, diapers, toilet paper, soap and shampoo, and food — to charities that cost less to produce or less.

If we share the cost of discounts and refer families through social workers, teachers, health visitors, GPs and food banks, we can provide vital goods to those who are too poor to buy them in the most cost-effective way .indeed, In the pilot phase of the new program multiple banks – Standing alongside the food bank, bringing together food, clothes, bedding, toiletries, furniture and babies – every £1 donated buys £5 worth of supplies.

This partnership is not a permanent or comprehensive solution. This will be a transitional arrangement of one or two years, which will only succeed if the welfare improvements provided by the government exceed the in-kind value provided by other countries. This won’t be the end of poverty, but it is a signal of poverty as a whole. National Needs: The Beginning of the End. It will address the costs that are now crippling families and create space to repair our welfare safety net.By communities, charities, companies and governments working together to achieve shared national goals, we can quickly end poverty, and Back 2,600 food banks in their ambition to cut themselves off – a divided country can find unity and hope again.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button